LAC’s Letter to the Washington Post Editor in Support of Insurance Coverage for MAT

Click here to view this letter on the Washington Post website.

The Oct. 16 front-page article “An industry’s answer to deadly opioid addiction: More pills” did not address an even bigger question: Why will insurance companies pay for medications to treat the side effects of opioid use disorders — and the opioids themselves — but not the medications that treat people who become addicted?

Treatment that uses three Food and Drug Administration-approved medications — methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone — is effective, helping hundreds of thousands of people recover from opioid use disorders. Yet many insurance plans sold on state insurance exchanges and offered by employers don’t cover such treatment.

I have counseled many individuals with opioid use disorders who purchased insurance for the primary purpose of covering their medication-assisted treatment, only to learn that their plan didn’t pay for it or created significant barriers to obtaining it.

The federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, which was signed into law in 2008, was designed to render this insurance exclusion unlawful. Robust enforcement of the Parity Act would save precious lives and billions of dollars spent on the tragic consequences of untreated addiction.

Ellen M. Weber

Ellen Weber is the Vice President for Health Initiatives, Legal Action Center, and Professor of Law, University of Maryland Carey School of Law

Share this

Need Legal Help?

¿Necesita ayuda en español?

FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions) and other legal resources.

View Here Ver aquí

Support Us

You can become a partner in the fight against stigma and discrimination and for smart, effective public policies by making a tax-deductible donation.

Lend your support